THE GAMMA SPIKE IS BAAAAAAACCKKKKK

Reading Time: 7 minutes

TLDR: The gamma spike is BAAAACCCKKKK!!!!!! Today we blew past the delta neutral AND the gamma maximum point. I’ll be honest that I don’t think I’ve ever seen that before!

Although I can’t predict the future, I can use the gamma spikes to tell us if the gamma squeeze is continuing, or if we’ve peaked/another type of squeeze will be taking over.

I made a post yesterday giving a boring update that the Delta Neutral was $164 and the Gamma Maximum was $190

First, I’ll show in a log-based 10 scale so you can see these beautiful, glorious gamma spikes in all their glory. For anyone new, I’ll add definitions/context later on.

r/Superstonk - THE GAMMA SPIKE IS BAAAAAAACCKKKKK

GME 1/4/2021 – 8/24/2021 Log based 10

Now here’s a close up view:

r/Superstonk - THE GAMMA SPIKE IS BAAAAAAACCKKKKK

GME 1/4/2021 – 8/24/2021

ok, so a few very important points to make about the Gamma Neutral spikes:

  • They are generally reactive, and not very predictive. They indicate an imbalance in the options market.
  • They CAN be used to help judge what’s happening in a gamma squeeze.
  • For example, the January/March squeeze has spikes every day that were generally INCREASING.
  • However, the June spikes were kind of one-hit-wonders, and probably not truly a gamma squeeze all the way up to $300.
  • As far as I can tell, the height of the spikes don’t determine the height of a gamma squeeze. I only like to look for spikes that are relatively increasing compared to prior days.

For educational purposes, I’ll show you the A&M&C log-based 10 chart, which I think has important lessons from their May/June squeeze:

r/Superstonk - THE GAMMA SPIKE IS BAAAAAAACCKKKKK

A&M&C 1/4/2021 – 8/24/2021 – Log based 10 view

  • As you can see, the A&M&C squeeze started in late May, and their gamma spikes were continuous and generally increased through their big run
  • When the gamma spike stopped near the top, it was generally a sign that the squeeze was over.
  • Similar things happened with the GME January surge and the A&M&C surge.

Important caveat – this is just for gamma squeezes. This is not for short-squeezes or FTD squeezes. Other squeezes could take over, but this post is just to monitor the potential gamma squeeze.

What does this mean for the future? It’s hard to say. I think tomorrow will be very telling if this was a one-hit-wonder, or if we’re in a true gamma squeeze (continue to increase dramatically).

This is exciting stuff, and I will continue to monitor closely!!!

Now some copy/paste for anyone new to my posts, and who need a bit of context.

Recap

Here’s a quick recap of my recent posts:

On 7/13, I called out that we were about to hit the DN, and it will probably mean we’ll bounce off it, like we have in the past.

But we didn’t bounce off it, instead we sunk underneath it for the first time since February. I gave an overview of life under the DN.

On 7/20, it looked like we would blow past the DN, and I warned that sometimes stocks bounce off it like a ceiling a couple times before going over.

Then we blew past the DN, and was hopeful we escaped the DN and wouldn’t bounce around it for awhile.

I was wrong again, it sunk back down, and started bouncing around underneath the DN for awhile

I was dreading posting the bearish pattern GME was showing while bouncing under the DN, but figured it wasn’t ethical to only post when I had good things to say.

I wrote another post of the influence the bearish options market was having on the underlying stock.

Yesterday, I posted a quick update about the DN at $164 and the GM at $190

Got So excited we were blowing past the DN/GM that I had to post a quick update!

Overview

In general, all stock indicators boil down to two things – reversion to the mean and momentum. Every trader wants to accurately predict these two forces better than other guy, and if you use different indicators than the other guy, that an give you an ‘alpha’ in trading if it’s a better predictor.

I make a lot of different indicators, but the two primary ones are the Delta Neutral and Gamma Neutral/Maximum:

  • Delta Neutral (DN) – This helps identify reversion to the mean, and represents the underlying price that would create a total market delta of 0 across all GME options (all expiration dates) for a given date. In general, it acts like a floor to the underlying price, but if the price drops below the delta neutral, then it tends to shoot back up above that line.
    • This is generally how I trade my model. I watch for stocks that drop below the DN, and buy them, expecting for traders to identify that the stock is underpriced and will revert back to a higher level.
  • Gamma Neutral (GN) and Gamma Maximum (GM) – This helps identify momentum. The GN represents the underlying price that would create a total market gamma of 0 across all GME options (all expiration dates) for a given date, whereas the GM represents the underlying price that would create the maximum gamma across the market.
    • In general, a sudden increase in gamma indicates a sharp upward in momentum that continues until that gamma drops.
    • The GM seems to act like a ceiling, but fun things happen when the underlying crossing that threshold!

This is my own personal ‘alpha’ that I developed for my own trading purposes, and am sharing with this community because it’s given me back so much. This is not financial advice. I’m just a mathematician that likes to play with options data, and I am not a professional trader.

There’s a detailed methodology and assumptions section at the bottom if you want to know more.

Methodology and Assumptions

Delta Neutral

The Delta Neutral price that creates a total market delta of 0 across all GME options (all expiration dates) for a given date. It can also be though of as the intersection of a supply/demand curve for hedged stocks. See the “Methodology and Assumptions” section for full detail on how I develop this indicator.

Notes below for general options on how the delta neutral interacts with the underlying price:

  • There is a large influx of call option purchases, because:
    • The call prices get less expensive as the underlying price approaches the delta neutral
    • Stock prices usually rebound/revert back to the mean after large crashes, so the price often rebounds anyways.
  • With the large influx of call volume, market makers have to start buying stocks to delta hedge, which turns the price back around and creates an upward trajectory.
    • Important note that hedgies often hedge with derivatives instead of buying stocks, so there isn’t a 1-to-1 relationship between the delta and shares bought/sold by hedge funds.
  • Historically, you can see that GME often bounces off the delta neutral prices during drops. The exception is the February drop. When the underlying goes below the delta neutral price, a lot of pressure builds up that results in a significant increase when that pressure is released.
    • Note this is the primary way that I trade my model. I made a scanner that looks for equities that fall below the delta neutral.

Gamma Neutral

The Gamma Neutral price that creates a total market gamma of 0 across all GME options (all expiration dates) for a given date. See the “Methodology and Assumptions” section for full detail on how I develop this indicator.

General notes below for observations on how this indicator behaves:

  • It acts like support/resistance between the delta neutral and the underlying, and typically bounces around between the two prices for most symbols (like we have seen with GME since April).
  • It also goes crazy in periods of high volatility, as you can see by the very higher spikes.
  • A gamma spike indicates the presence of POTENTAILLY slippery option market conditions, which COULD lead to a gamma squeeze. There were certainly spikes present back in January, but we had a few one-day false starts this last month.
  • They are often triggered by high price movement in a day, which can lead to continue high growth if underlying volume supports it.
  • Gamma spikes can also be triggered by unusual options purchases during the day. These are the one ones to find, because you can often catch the high increase waves before they actually start.
  • If I’m trading this indicator, I often either wait for a gamma spike to continue for 2 days in a row and supported by increased volume. Otherwise, I invest straight away if I find a gamma spike just based on options movement (i.e. no significant underlying increase yet).

I write my own algorithms to produce the results above. The following lists some key methodology and assumptions I use:

  • I rely on daily options and stock summaries produced by www.historicaloptionsdata.com
  • For the Implied Volatility (IV), I use the following method:
    • Calculate the raw IV of the mid-point between bid/ask price at close.
    • Calculate a “blend” IV, which represents the IV where the call/put parity holds, i.e. where call delta – put delta = 1, using the same IV.
    • Smooth the mid-point call/put and blend IV using a gaussian smoothing algorithm with a 20-strike window.
    • Apply the smoothed call/put relativities to the smoothed blended IV curve
    • Fill any missing values with a linear interpolation of the neighboring strikes.
  • Using the final call/put IV estimates described above, I calculate my own Greeks. I like this source if you’re interested in the formulas: https://www.macroption.com/option-greeks-excel
  • For the total market delta and total market gamma, I rely on the OI x delta and OI x gamma for each strike price.
    • Note that the delta of a call is usually equal to (1 – put delta), so not adjustment is needed to the delta signs when calculating the total market delta.
    • However, the call/put gammas are both positive based on the B-S calculation. If you’re calculating the total gamma for a portfolio, or the total market, you have to add the call gamma and subtract the put gamma.
  • To estimate the delta neutral and the gamma neutral, I have an algorithm that relies on the optimization toolbox in Matlab to identify an underlying price that achieve a total market delta and a total market gamma.
  • Note that the IV would change with higher/lower prices for the delta/gamma neutral and the sensitivity tests, but the impact is not significant enough to make a meaningful difference and takes significant processing time to apply the IV curves. However, it is an important simplifying assumption to be aware of.
  • Open Interest (OI) is always lagged one day for options summaries. The OCC releases final open interest on a given day, and it represents the OI for the close of the prior day. Therefore, the OI I get in my summaries on 6/28 does not represent the OI as of close on 6/28. It represents the OI as of close on 6/25. If you see a source like Yahoo give live OI throughout the day, they are only estimates, and their algorithm methodology for estimating the OI based on various price/volume movement is a closely guarded secret. Using the prior day OI is currently a limitation of the data available to me.

Disclaimer: I’m just a mathematician that likes to play with options data and builds models to trade for a hobby. I have no experience trading professionally or offering any advice to anyone. This is just one indicator for one type of price movement, and there are many other indicators that can help you make investment decisions.

Published
Categorized as gme

Feel free to comment on this (be decent, no spam, fud and shills)